|
|
Employment E-Bulletin - 2 February 2012 Read More |
|
|
Hand Morgan & Owen Art Sponsorship 2011 draws to a close - 22 December 2011 Read More |
|
|
Further Reforms to Sickness Absence Rules - 13 December 2011 Read More |
Stafford Office:
Tel. +44 (0)1785 211411
Click here to email us
Rugeley Office:
Tel. +44 (0)1889 583871
Click here to email us
|
|
|
HMO QUARTERLY EMPLOYMENT BULLETIN EMPLOYMENT ACT 2008 & ACAS CODE OF PRACTICE 1. Letter The legislation provided a 3 month extension on time limits where this dispute resolution procedure was followed. A failure to comply with the statutory rules meant that: The system was very unsuccessful and created a number of difficulties for employers and employees. It led to a flood of case law including disputes as to what actually constituted a grievance. The provisions of the Employment Act 2008 come into force 6 April 2009. Its key changes are: • The repeal of the mandatory three step system for Grievance and Discipline matters Under the new system: • The Tribunal will take the contents of the ACAS Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance into account in unfair dismissal cases when deciding whether a party acted reasonably. • A Tribunal will be able to increase or reduce awards by up to 25% where it considers there has been an unreasonable failure to follow a relevant Code of Practice • Employers still have a duty to respond to written grievances raised by employees The new ACAS Discipline and Grievance Code is currently in draft form and comes into effect from 6 April 2009. It applies to discipline and grievance, not redundancy (there is a pre-existing ACAS guide to redundancy). There will be a separate more detailed guidance booklet but Tribunals will not be obliged to follow this. ACAS sets out key issues for disciplinary procedures including: Importantly the same 3 step format applies but a there are a number of new procedural requirements suggested by ACAS. For example: Whilst suggesting a standard of reasonable behaviour the Code recognises “… it may sometimes not be practicable for all employers to take all of the steps set out”. Employment Tribunals will be able to take into account the size and resources of an employer giving some leeway for smaller employers. This is an important change. Employers will need to be familiar with the Code and follow it to maximise prospects of defending an unfair dismissal claim. Existing procedures will require some fine tuning. RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION In this case a carer asked a service user if he believed in God and went to church. It was accepted that there was a distinction between dismissal for possession of religious belief (which is unfair and discriminatory) and dismissal for the inappropriate imposing of those beliefs on others. SPELL IT RIGHT In such circumstances it was not necessary to investigate whether the intended Respondent had received the claim form and a default judgment could be set aside. CARE HOMES AND CARE WORKERS ; POVA LIST UNLAWFUL ? This removes the possibility of employment with another care provider. Regrettably employees are often placed on this list with limited enquiry (and without a right to make representations). There is an appeal process but this takes a number of months. The House of Lords has held that the list is inconsistent with the human right to a fair trial has issued a Declaration of Incompatibility. Unfortunately the POVA legislation remains effective until amended by parliament. HOMOPHOBIA AGAINST HETEROSEXUALS The banter arose because Mr English went to a boarding school and lived in Brighton. TRIBUNAL AWARDS • The calculation of a week's pay at £350 (note this is also the figure for redundancy calculation ) HOLIDAYS STATUTORY PAY The standard rate of statutory sick pay increases to £79.15 from 6 April.
The contents of this article are for the purposes of general awareness only. They do not purport to constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this article was published. Readers should not act on the basis of the information included and should take appropriate professional advice upon their own particular circumstances. |